Am 21.12.13 09:06, schrieb Gregory Ewing:
Michael Torrie wrote:
Maybe BASIC's of the 70s.  But Not QB.  QuickBasic was a pretty
impressive compiler in its day.  Completely modern, structured language.

I may have been thinking of GW-BASIC. There was
definitely something that was pretty much an
old-school BASIC with line numbers, GOSUBS and
all that.


GW-BASIC was a weak language, but two significant characters is definitely too few. I think it was eight. Never used QuickBasic, I went Turbo Pascal instead, which had 32 significant characters.

        Christian
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to