Am 21.12.13 09:06, schrieb Gregory Ewing:
Michael Torrie wrote:
Maybe BASIC's of the 70s. But Not QB. QuickBasic was a pretty
impressive compiler in its day. Completely modern, structured language.
I may have been thinking of GW-BASIC. There was
definitely something that was pretty much an
old-school BASIC with line numbers, GOSUBS and
all that.
GW-BASIC was a weak language, but two significant characters is
definitely too few. I think it was eight. Never used QuickBasic, I went
Turbo Pascal instead, which had 32 significant characters.
Christian
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list