On 17/12/2013 09:18, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Le mardi 17 décembre 2013 09:33:24 UTC+1, Mark Lawrence a écrit :
On 17/12/2013 07:58, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
From all the toolkits, wxPython is probably the most
interesting. I used all versions from 2.0 (?) up to 2.8. Then
it has been decided to go unicode.
Let see in the wx interactive intepreter, it is only
the top of the iceberg. (Py27, wxPy294)
len('ሴЃ')
5
---
It has alos been decided to rework wxPython and create
wxPhoenix, unicode of course.
Impossible to put a Python string correctly in a widget
supposed to handle text. The design mistake is more
deeper than in wx29 (unicode).
I do not know the present status, but as the mistake
is a consequence of a unicode non understanding (plus
a little bit Python, plus a little bit wxWidgets), I doubt
that some improvement happened.
I attempted to explain unicode...
jmf
wxPython 3 (Phoenix) will be the first version that supports Python 3.
This will obviously mean that for the first time, wxPython will be able
to take full advantage of the superb PEP393 Flexible String
Representation (FSR) which is available in Python 3.3+.
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
I'm very happy for you.
You should at least serialized the tasks.
- wxPhoenix (wrapper of wxWidgets) is one thing
- wxPhoenix for Python3 / Python2 is something else
- Ditto for the FSR
- Ditto for "unicode"
For your information, that's at those times I decided
to have a look at the Qt derivatives, it was a very,
very good idea.
jmf
I haven't the faintest idea what your words above are meant to mean.
Your communication skills are clearly lacking, as you also still insist
on sending us double spaced google crap. Do you not understand the
instructions here https://wiki.python.org/moin/GoogleGroupsPython ?
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
