"George Sakkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> It's funny how one of the > arguments for removing lambda -- you can do the same by defining a > named function -- does not apply for list comprehensions. Which is a point a number of people have made many times, with about as much effect as spitting into the wind. Making a piece of functionality less convenient simply to satisfy someone's sense of language esthetics doesn't seem to me, at least, to be a really good idea. John Roth > > > George > -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
