On 11/28/13 9:04 AM, Tim Chase wrote:
On 2013-11-28 03:58, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
input = open(self.full_path)
output = open(self.output_csv, 'ab')
with input as input, output as output:
...
That's really clever! Why didn't I think of that?
Because if the 2nd output fails, the input doesn't get closed as
it {w,sh}ould in a with-statement? :-)
D'oh, sorry. A doubly-nested with statement?
input = open(self.full_path)
with input:
output = open(self.output_csv, 'ab')
with output:
...
Of course, if you were willing to use a doubly-nested with statement,
then the original open-in-the-with form would have fit in 80 chars...
Also, I have a sneaking suspicion there's still an error case not
handled well, someone will point it out if so!
--Ned.
-tkc
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
