On 11/16/2013 08:18 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Verde Denim <tdl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Chris >> Yes, I mean precisely that. The password was sent to me in the body of >> the message in plaintext. That is what has me very concerned about the >> list and its ability to protect private information. > The list specifically told you not to use a valuable password :) In > fact, a password is completely optional - it's just an alternative to > always having to do a click-through. > > ChrisA ChrisA Each one of my accounts is completely different (and as random as I can get them). Each one is also uniquely set to match a set of criteria of my own choosing to indicate level of data, level of composite data, level of integrity, level of criticality, and a few other 'soft values'. This equates to each account being generated in a one-off fashion, so I'm not worried that my list account here will ever show up somewhere else in any other form. However, that doesn't mean that it doesn't concern me that the list is publishing these values back to the list participant(s) in plaintext. If I have to unsubscribe and then re-subscribe without a pass-phrase I can do that but just wanted to make the list admin(s) aware that it had occurred.
-- Regards Jack Boston Tea Party, Coercive Acts, Powder Alarm, Revolution Lessons (Mistakes) not learned are bound to be repeated. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
