On Friday, November 8, 2013 9:18:05 PM UTC+5:30, jonas.t...@gmail.com wrote: > Den fredagen den 8:e november 2013 kl. 03:43:17 UTC+1 skrev zipher: > > >> I am not sure if it is just stupidness or laziness that prevent you from > > >> seeing that 4^8=65536. > > > I can see that 4^8 = 65536. Now how are you going to render 65537? You > > > claimed that you could render *any* number efficiently. What you've > > > proven is that a small subset of numbers can be rendered efficiently. > > I think the idea would be to find the prime factorization for a given > > number, which has been proven to be available (and unique) for any and > > every number. Most numbers can compress given this technique. Prime > > numbers, of course, would not be compressed.
> 3^2-2^2=5 Oh my! What a profound insight!! -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
