jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote: > >Well let me try to explain why it is working and i have implemented one. >I only need to refresh my memory it was almost 15 years ago. >This is not the solution but this is why it is working. >65536=256^2=16^4=***4^8***=2^16
All of those values are indeed the same, and yet that is completely unrelated to compression. Did you honestly believe this was actually explaining anything? >Yes i am aware that 256 is a single byte 8 bits, but the approach is valid >anyway. This whole post is a most amazing collection of non sequiturs. If you would like to describe your compression scheme, there really are people here who would be interested in reading it (although that number gets less and less as this thread goes on). -- Tim Roberts, t...@probo.com Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
