On 30/10/2013 20:52, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 30-10-13 21:02, patrick vrijlandt schreef:
Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Ben Finney <ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au> wrote:
Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> writes:
*Definitely* use source control.
+1, but prefer to call it a “version control system” which is (a) more
easily searched on the internet, and (b) somewhat more accurate.
Right. I've picked up some bad habits, and I think Dave may also
have... but yes, "distributed version control system" is what I'm
talking about here.
ChrisA
Thanks. Do you all agree that Mercurial is the way to go, or is there
another "distributed version control system" that I should shortlist?
This is a question that only you can answer trough experience. I started
out with bazaar, tried out git at bit and finaly ended up using mercurial
but others have followed their own trail.
So start a small project and try to use a number of them simultaneously
and then decide which feels more natural to you.
And if the worst comes to the worst there's always Visual Source Safe.
Starts running with trenching tool, camouflage net, tin hat, flak
jacket... :)
--
Python is the second best programming language in the world.
But the best has yet to be invented. Christian Tismer
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
