On Thursday 17 October 2013 17:34:15 Mark Lawrence did opine:
> On 17/10/2013 20:43, Ian Kelly wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Roy Smith <r...@panix.com> wrote:
> >> On Thursday, October 17, 2013 11:07:48 AM UTC-4, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >>> Module names should be descriptive, not fancy.
> >>
> >> Interesting comment, on a mailing list for a language named after a
> >> snake, especially by a guy who claims to prefer an language named
> >> after a fish :-)
> >
> > Well, he did say "module names", not "language names". Few language
> > names are descriptive, and those that are tend to be acronyms: BASIC,
> > LISP, COBOL, PHP, APL. Note that while that last one is descriptive,
> > it does very little to distinguish itself from any other programming
> > language.
>
> It's just so unfair, poor old CORAL gets left out of this type of list
> every time :(
And I feel the same about ARexx. An extremely capable language for the
amiga & the only higher level language I ever wrote a commercial
application in.
But boy was I disappointed when I moved some ARexx code to linux & tried to
execute it with Regina. Never got past the 2nd line because Regina was in
such a small sandbox it couldn't even ask the system for the correct time.
Rexx/Regina might have had 5% of the functionality that ARexx had. But
commode door never gave Bill Hawes a damned dime for his efforts, not even
any royalties from his book.
Cheers, Gene
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Power is danger.
-- The Centurion, "Balance of Terror", stardate 1709.2
A pen in the hand of this president is far more
dangerous than 200 million guns in the hands of
law-abiding citizens.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
