On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:32 AM, rusi <rustompm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:56:27 AM UTC+5:30, zipher wrote: >> Yes, well clearly we are not "having the same thoughts", yet the >> purpose of the academic establishment is to pin down such terminology >> and not have these sloppy understandings everywhere. You dig? > > Heh Mark I am really sorry. I think this is the third or fourth time that I > say something to which you reply with such egregious rubbish -- parsing has > something to do with card-punches?!?! Yeah like python has something to do > with the purple shirt I am wearing -- that a dozen others jump at you with a > resounding 'Cut the crap!'
You feedback is respected. However, you haven't included in your analysis that you have a closed group here of Python aficionados. I invite you to take a look at http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?TypeSystemCategoriesInImperativeLanguagesTwo before you continue to issue insults. > Likewise here. I certainly 'dig' your passion to clean up the 'sloppy > understandings everywhere' and would only wish for you the sanity of more > knowledge of the subject before you begin to hold forth. Talk to me after you've finished your assignment. -- MarkJ Tacoma, Washington -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
