"Steven D'Aprano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 05 Jul 2005 09:46:41 -0500, Terry Hancock wrote: [snip]
> > Having said that, I too will miss the *concept* of an anonymous > > function, although I wouldn't mind at all if its name changed, or if it > > were somehow integrated into the "def" keyword's usage. > > Def would be short for ... defend? defile? defer? defame? default? deflect? > > There's always *something* to learn. Why def instead of define? Because > "easy to write" beats "instantly obvious to a beginner", if the word is > used all the time and is easy to memorize. Still it's hard to explain why four specific python keywords - def, del, exec and elif - were chosen to be abbreviated, while all the rest are full words (http://docs.python.org/ref/keywords.html). "Ease of typing" is a joke for an excuse; "finally" is longer than "define","delete" and equally long to "execute" and "else if" (the latter has the even more serious flaw of going against TOOWTDI and in this case practicallity hardly beats purity IMO). In any case, python was never about minimizing keystrokes; theres another language that strives for this <wink>. So, who would object the full-word versions for python 3K ? def -> define del -> delete exec -> execute elif -> else if George -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
