"J. Bagg" <j.b...@kent.ac.uk> writes:
> I've checked the original files using od and they don't have BOMs. > > I'll remove them in the servlet. The overhead is probably small enough > unless somebody is doing a massive search. We have a limit anyway to > prevent somebody stealing the entire set of data. > > I started writing the Python search because the ancient C search had > started putting out BOMs. I'm actually mystified because our home Linux > box does not add BOMs even though it runs 2.7 but my work one does even > though it has the same version. The only difference is Fedora 18 v > Fedora 17. > > The BOMs are certainly there: > > <86> <AD><FB>%R 10C0203z-621 > %A François-Xavier Le_Bourdonnec > > 0000000 206 255 373 % R 1 0 C 0 2 0 3 z - > That is not a BOM or SIG. It isn't even valid utf-8. -- Piet van Oostrum <p...@vanoostrum.org> WWW: http://pietvanoostrum.com/ PGP key: [8DAE142BE17999C4] -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
