Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Jeremy Sanders ><jer...@jeremysanders.net> wrote: >> Chris Angelico wrote: >> >>> Because s/he thought it made for better code, or as a joke? Usually I >>> see this sort of thing as the latter...
It was intended for clearer code, which is true if you don't like curly braces, and who does round here? >> >> http://oldhome.schmorp.de/marc/bournegol.html >> http://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/programming/BourneGol > > Yep, that's some impressive code right there! > > ChrisA > That brings back memories all right, but its not as good as the version I remember as it doesn't 'fix' the logical operator priorities. -- Duncan Booth http://kupuguy.blogspot.com -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
