On 29 August 2013 20:43, Ian Kelly <ian.g.ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Steven D'Aprano
> <steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 01:57:16 -0700, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
> >
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> Having repr(None) == 'None' is sure the right thing but why does
> >> str(None) == 'None'? Wouldn't it be more correct if it was an empty
> >> string?
> >
> >
> > Why do you think an empty string is more correct? Would you expect
> > str([]) or str(0.0) or str({}) to also give an empty string?
> >
> >
> > I can't see any reason for str(None) to return the empty string.
>
> I've had many occasions where it would have been convenient for
> str(None) to return the empty string, e.g. when exporting tabular data
> that includes null values from a database to a spreadsheet. Generally
> it's safe to just call str() on the data, except that I'd rather empty
> cells just be empty rather than spamming the word "None" all over the
> place, so I end up having to do something like (str(value) if value is
> not None else '') instead. Not a major inconvenience, but enough to
> make me wonder if there could be a better way.
>
There is.
def format(value):
if value is None:
return ''
return str(value)
print(format(value))
This also allows you to format other types differently e.g. only output 2
decimal places for non-integer numeric types.
Tim Delaney
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
