On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 11:25:44 PM UTC+5:30, rand...@fastmail.us wrote: > I think, though, that if there's any useful information that can be > obtained by reading accepted PEPs but not the documentation, or if > things are explained less clearly than in the PEPs, that's a bug in the > documentation, and should be remedied by adding to the documentation.
PEP8 is referenced a lot but only a very small portion is included in the documentation (in the tutorial). I am a Python newbie and there may be other PEPs usually referenced which I might not be aware about. Maybe add selected PEPs to the documentation? I agree that adding rejected PEPs is no good but there may be PEPs worthy of addition to the documentation. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
