wxjmfa...@gmail.com writes:
> As a stupid scientist, I have the habbit to compare
> things of the same nature with the same units.
>
> This *string* containing one *character*
>
>>>> sys.getsizeof('a')
> 26
>
> consumes 26 *bytes*.
I'm not an expert in stupid science, and I fail to see the "common"
nature of the stuff you are comparing. Strings are not characters, and
neither the latter are bytes.
Anyway, trying to apply the same stupid science, I notice a much more
amazing fact:
>>> sys.getsizeof(True)
24
Does Python really needs twentyfour bytes to store a *single* bit of
information?? Wow, since by definition a byte contains eight bits,
there's a factor of 192... what a shame!
:-)
> —————
>
> Python seems to consider os.linesep as a
> str.
>
>>>> isinstance(os.linesep, str)
> True
Yes, I bet in stupid languages that would be either a single character,
or a tuple of two or more characters, much more usable and compact.
> —————
>
> PS A "mole" is not a number.
Oh, nice to know. And OOC, what is a "mole" in your stupid science?
OTOH, WTF does that matter in current thread and with Python in general?
ciao, lele.
--
nickname: Lele Gaifax | Quando vivrò di quello che ho pensato ieri
real: Emanuele Gaifas | comincerò ad aver paura di chi mi copia.
l...@metapensiero.it | -- Fortunato Depero, 1929.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
