Le vendredi 2 août 2013 13:07:47 UTC+2, Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick a écrit : > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:51 AM, Roy Smith <r...@panix.com> wrote: > > > In article <mailman.93.1375386763.1251.python-l...@python.org>, > > > Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote: > > > > > >> Newly revised this morning: > > >> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/#maximum-line-length > > >> summary: > > >> 72 for text block (comments, triple-quoted strings) > > >> 79 for normal code > > >> 99 for code that is really more readable with extra > > > > > > And the people did rejoice and did feast upon the lambs and toads and > > > tree-sloths and fruit-bats and orangutans and breakfast cereals. > > > > The 99-characters rule does not apply for the stdlib. And outside of > > the stdlib, PEP 8 is not mandated by Python (but it might be by the > > project leader or similar entities). If someone wanted long lines, > > then they could do so ALL THE TIME. > > > > So, what are you feasting for? Nothing? > > > > -- > > Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick <http://kwpolska.tk> > > PGP: 5EAAEA16 > > stop html mail | always bottom-post | only UTF-8 makes sense
And do not forget, a monospaced font is never monospaced (for understandable reasons). The solely valid solution, assuming there is some wish, is to define a maximal line width (preferably in SI units ;-) The day, the devs succeed to think non ascii, is not arrived. jmf PS independently of the CJK stuff. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
