Ron Adam wrote: > Each item needs to stand on it's own. It's a much stronger argument for > removing something because something else fulfills it's need and is > easier or faster to use than just saying we need x because we have y. > > In this case sum and product fulfill 90% (estimate of course) of reduces > use cases. It may actually be as high as 99% for all I know. Or it may > be less. Anyone care to try and put a real measurement on it?
Well, reduce covers 100% of them, and it's one function, and it's already there. -- Erik Max Francis && [EMAIL PROTECTED] && http://www.alcyone.com/max/ San Jose, CA, USA && 37 20 N 121 53 W && AIM erikmaxfrancis I'm not jumping in / A wave that just passes -- Sandra St. Victor -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
