On 2013-08-01, Joseph L. Casale <jcas...@activenetwerx.com> wrote: > A bit vague I know, but does anyone see the obvious mistake? I > assumed the module setting up a singleton connection was a > perfectly viable way to accomplish this?
My one db application started out creating a new connection to the db (sqlite3) for every select and insert. When I converted it to maintaining it's own single connection and creating new cursors instead it was a huge speed increase. So I too am interested in the answers you'll hopefully be getting. I have no plans for utilizing concurrent access to the db, but maybe I'll want to someday. -- Neil Cerutti -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
