On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:02:42 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Steven D'Aprano
> <steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote:
>> Dicts aren't sets, and don't support set methods:
>>
>> py> d1 - d2
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
>> TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for -: 'dict' and 'dict'
>
> I wouldn't take this as particularly significant, though. A future
> version of Python could add that support (and it might well be very
> useful), without breaking any of the effects of views.
I don't think dicts can ever support set methods, since *they aren't
sets*. Every element consists of both a key and a value, so you have to
consider both. Set methods are defined in terms of singleton elements,
not binary elements, so before you even begin, you have to decide what
does it mean when two elements differ in only one of the two parts?
Given dicts {1: 'a'}, {1: 'b'}, what is the union of them? I can see five
possibilities:
{1: 'a'}
{1: 'b'}
{1: ['a', 'b']}
{1: set(['a', 'b'])}
Error
Each of the five results may be what you want in some circumstances. It
would be a stupid thing for dict.union to pick one behaviour and make it
the One True Way to perform union on two dicts.
--
Steven
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
