On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:24 AM, <pablobarhamal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi there Chris. > Unfortunately, using iterations was about twice as slow as the original > implementation, so that's not the solution. > Thank's anyway.
Fascinating! Well, was worth a try anyhow. But that's a very surprising result. ChrisA -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list