On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 4:47 PM, zoom <z...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Probably... > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz#JSTOR
Things are always more complicated than any simple Usenet post can do justice to, and it'll often come down to who has the biggest legal budget. Since he was never actually found guilty (or so a cursory reading of that Wikipedia page suggests), that can't really be taken as proof; anyone can be charged with anything if someone can trump up some plausible evidence (no, I'm not completely cynical, why do you ask?), but that doesn't make walking and chewing gum at the same time a crime. Anyway, this is all technicalities; it's still unwise to advocate legally and/or morally shady actions in public. You never know what people will find back years later. ChrisA -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
