On 07/04/2013 01:32 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
<SNIP>
Well, if I ever have more than 63,000,000 variables[1] in a function,
I'll keep that in mind.
<SNIP>
[1] Based on empirical evidence that Python supports names with length at
least up to one million characters long, and assuming that each character
can be an ASCII letter, digit or underscore.
Well, the number wouldn't be 63,000,000. Rather it'd be 63**1000000
I probably have it wrong, but I think that looks like:
859,122,207,646,748,720,415,212,786,780,258,721,683,540,870,960,267,706,738,947,655,539,422,295,787,680,882,091,181,482,626,114,653,152,637,456,091,641,990,601,474,111,018,521,295,858,424,750,289,461,372,414,431,396,326,232,796,267,104,001
variables. (The number has 180 digits)
--
DaveA
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
