Steven Bethard wrote: > Fredrik Johansson wrote: > >> On 6/27/05, Reinhold Birkenfeld >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Do you have any other good and valued Python modules that you would >>> think are >>> bug-free, mature (that includes a long release distance) and useful >>> enough to >>> be granted a place in the stdlib? >> >> >> First of all, numeric/numarray, obviously! > > > There has been recent discussion about this. Check the python-dev list > archives I think. It's unlikely that all of numeric/numarray could go > into the Python stdlib because there still is disagreement between the > two camps as to the module architecture. However, there does seem to be > some agreement at the level of the basic array object, so it may be > possible that at least the array object itself might join the stdlib in > the not too distant future. I suspect there's more detailed discussion > of this in the numeric/numarray lists.
There was a flurry of exchanges about three months ago but it soon died. One thing which needs to be sorted out is the silent truncation of complex values: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1216688&group_id=1369&atid=450446 Colin W. > > STeVe -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
