On 24 Jun 2013 22:29, "Ian Kelly" <ian.g.ke...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Fábio Santos <fabiosantos...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This can probably be best achieved by adding to the existing for loop, > > so maybe taking advantage of the existing for...if syntax and adding > > for...while would be a better idea? > > The for...if syntax only exists for comprehensions and generators. If > we're going to add for...while for loops, then we might as well go > ahead and add for...if loops there as well. > > That said, I do like this syntax better than "fwhile".
Good point. Still, I don't see why for..if doesn't exist in for loops anyway. It may be lack of foresight, but I don't understand why at all.
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
