On 05/25/2013 09:49 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
In article <15a1bb3a-514c-454e-a966-243c84123...@googlegroups.com>,
John Ladasky <john_lada...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Because someone's got to say it... "The generation of random numbers is too
important to be left to chance." ‹ Robert R. Coveyou
Absolutely. I know just enough about random number generation to
understand that I don't really know anything about it :-)
That being said, people who really care about random numbers, tend to
rely on some sort of physical process instead of computer algorithms. A
classic example would be /dev/random. A somewhat more fun example is
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7n8LNxGbZbs. Something radioactive and a
geiger counter are a good source of randomness (time intervals between
decay events).
That's good unless you're a cat, and you belong to Schroedinger...
--
DaveA
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
