I don't think you go far enough. Obviously we need way more flexibility. A simple on/off is okay for some things, but a finer granularity would be really helpful because some things are more important than others. And why stop at stdout/stderr? We need to add a consistent way to output these messages to files too in case we need to reference them again. The messages should have a consistent format as well. Why add the same information to each message when it would be much simpler to simply define a default format and insert the real meat of the message into it? It really seems like we should already have something like this. Hmm..... -- CPython 3.3.2 | Windows NT 6.2.9200 / FreeBSD 9.1 -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
- Re: PyWart: The problem with "print" Dan Sommers
- Re: PyWart: The problem with "print&quo... Jason Swails
- Re: PyWart: The problem with "print... Tim Delaney
- Python Heisenbugs? (was: Re: PyWart: Th... Dan Sommers
- Re: Python Heisenbugs? (was: Re: Py... Chris Angelico
- Re: Python Heisenbugs? (was: Re: Py... Devin Jeanpierre
- Re: PyWart: The problem with "print&quo... Dan Sommers
- Re: PyWart: The problem with "print... Robert Kern
- Re: PyWart: The problem with "print&quo... Mark Lawrence
- Re: PyWart: The problem with "print... Dave Angel
- Re: PyWart: The problem with "print" Andrew Berg
- Re: PyWart: The problem with "print" Chris Angelico
- Re: PyWart: The problem with "print" Dan Sommers
- Re: PyWart: The problem with "print" Rick Johnson
- Re: PyWart: The problem with "print" Ned Batchelder
- Re: PyWart: The problem with "print" Michael Torrie
- Re: PyWart: The problem with "print&quo... Chris Angelico
- Re: PyWart: The problem with "print&quo... Alister
- Re: PyWart: The problem with "print" Rick Johnson
- Re: PyWart: The problem with "print" Steven D'Aprano
- Re: PyWart: The problem with "print" Chris Angelico