On 2013-05-16 14:08, Skip Montanaro wrote: > > So rather than > >>a > >>b > >>c > >>d > >>e > >>f > > I would get [a, b, c, d, e, f] > > all_items = [] > for row in reader: > all_items.append(row[0])
And following up here, this could be tidily rewritten as all_items = [row[0] for row in reader] -tkc -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
