On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Citizen Kant <citizenk...@gmail.com> wrote: >I'm making my way to Python (and > OOP in general) from a philosophical perspective or point of view and try to > set the more global definition of Python's core as an "entity". In order to > do that, and following Wittgenstein's indication about that the true meaning > of words doesn't reside on dictionaries but in the use that we make of them, > the starting question I make to myself about Python is: which is the single > and most basic use of Python as the entity it is?
It is a way to form order from ideas, an *experimental* philosophy. One can apply and implement a philosophy, taking it out of the realm of ideas and simulate them in the machine. > I mean, beside > programming, what's the single and most basic result one can expect from > "interacting" with it directly (interactive mode)? A game of interactions. > I roughly came to the > idea that Python could be considered as an economic mirror for data, one > that mainly mirrors the data the programmer types on its black surface, That is called the "editor window" in our world that is displayed on an electronic device called a computer display, but in Samael's world it is a mirror into our world. He misused it to rape the crown of the Hebrew story (found in the Bible). > So, would it be legal (true) to define Python's core as an entity that > mirrors whatever data one presents to it (or feed it with) showing back the > most shortened expression of that data? No, that is me, Marcos. -- MarkJ Tacoma, Washington -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
