Hi. I understood your point. thanks... rahul Steven Bethard wrote: > Steven Bethard wrote: > > > > def wrap(obj): > > def f(*args, **kwargs): > > for arg in args: > > print arg > > return obj(*args, **kwargs) > > return f > > > > @wrap > > def func(a, b, c): > > ... > > > > class C(object): > > ... > > C = wrap(C) > > Rahul top-posted: > > If you do C = wrap(C) C no longer remains a class..it becomes a > > function. > > And if you do > func = wrap(func) > which is the equivalent of > @wrap > def func(...): > ... > then func no longer has the same signature. But as Reinhold suggests, > does that really matter? In the case of the class, you can still call > it to create class instances. In the case of the function, you can > still call it to retrieve return values. Why do you care about the type > of the object? > > In the case that it does matter, e.g. you want to be able to invoke your > methods from the class instead of the instance, you can wrap the > specific function that you need wrapped, e.g. > > class C(object): > @wrap > def __new__(cls, *args): > super(C, cls).__new__(cls, *args) > ... > > STeVe
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
