In a previous post, http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_thread/thread/6aec70817705c226# ,
Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick wrote: “Is Unicode support so hard, especially in the 21st century?” -- Unicode is not really complicate and it works very well (more than two decades of development if you take into account iso-14****). But, - I can say, "as usual" - people prefer to spend their time to make a "better Unicode than Unicode" and it usually fails. Python does not escape to this rule. ----- I'm "busy" with TeX (unicode engine variant), fonts and typography. This gives me plenty of ideas to test the "flexible string representation" (FSR). I should recognize this FSR is failing particulary very well... I can almost say, a delight. jmf Unicode lover -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
