On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 11:41:46 +0100, Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
> On 7 April 2013 10:50, Helmut Jarausch <jarau...@skynet.be> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to port a class to Python3.3 which contains
>>
>> class Foo :
>> ....
>> def to_binary(self, *varargs, **keys):
>> ....
>>
>> ....
>> self.to_binary = new.instancemethod(to_binary, self,
>> self.__class__)
>
> `self` isn't bound in this lexical scope (the class scope). Or is your
> indentation incorrect? However, if this statement was within the
> `to_binary` method, then `to_binary` wouldn't be bound so I can't make a
> reasonable guess.
>
>> # Finally call it manually return apply(self.to_binary, varargs,
>> keys)
>>
> [...]
Sorry, the excerpt wasn't complete (it's not my code):
Here a more complete excerpt:
class Foo :
....
def to_binary(self, *varargs, **keys):
....
code= ...
args= ...
# Add function header
code = 'def to_binary(self, %s):\n' % ', '.join(args) + code
exec(code)
self.to_binary = new.instancemethod(to_binary, self, self.__class__)
return self.to_binary(*varargs, **keys)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
