On Mar 13, 3:07 pm, rusi <rustompm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 13, 2:36 pm, jmfauth <wxjmfa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > As a reply to rusi's > > comment:http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_thread/thread/... > > > From string creation to the itertools usage. A medley. Some timings. > > > Important: > > The real/absolute values of these experiments are not important. I do > > not care and I'm not complaining at all. > > > These values are expected, I expected such values and they are only > > confirming (*FOR ME*) my understanding of the coding of the characters > > (and Unicode). > > > #~ py323 py330 > > > #~ test 1: 0.015357737412819 0.019290216142579 > > #~ test 2: 0.015698801667198 0.020386269052436 > > #~ test 3: 0.015613338684288 0.018769561472500 > > #~ test 4: 0.023235297708529 0.032253414679390 > > #~ test 5: 0.023327062109534 0.029621391108935 > > #~ test 6: 1.119958127076760 1.095467665651482 > > #~ test 7: 0.420158472788311 0.565518010043673 > > #~ test 8: 0.649444234615974 1.061556978013171 > > #~ test 9: 0.712335144072079 1.211614222458175 > > #~ test 10: 0.704622996001357 1.160909074081441 > > #~ test 11: 0.614674584923621 1.053985430333688 > > #~ test 12: 0.660336235792764 1.059443246081010 > > #~ test 13: 4.821435927771570 5.795325214218677 > > #~ test 14: 0.494012668213403 0.729330462512273 > > #~ test 15: 0.504894429585788 0.879966255906103 > > #~ test 16: 0.693093370081103 1.132884304782264 > > #~ test 17: 0.749076743789461 3.013804437852462 > > #~ test 18: 7.467055989281286 13.387841650089342 > > #~ test 19: 7.581776062566778 13.593412812594643 > > #~ test 20: 9.477877493343140 15.235388291413805 > > #~ test 21: 0.022614608026196 0.020984116094176 > > #~ test 22: 6.685022041178975 12.687538276191944 > > #~ test 23: 6.946794763994170 12.986701250949636 > > #~ test 24: 0.097796827314760 0.156285014715777 > > #~ test 25: 0.024915807146677 0.034190706904894 > > #~ test 26: 0.024996544066013 0.032191582014335 > > #~ test 27: 0.000693943667684 0.001315421027272 > > #~ test 28: 0.000679765476967 0.001305968900141 > > #~ test 29: 0.001614344548152 0.025543979763000 > > #~ test 30: 0.000204008410812 0.000286714523313 > > #~ test 31: 0.000213460537964 0.000301286552656 > > #~ test 32: 0.000204008410819 0.000291440586878 > > #~ test 33: 0.249692904327539 0.497374474766957 > > #~ test 34: 0.248750448483740 0.513947598194790 > > #~ test 35: 0.099810130396032 0.249129715085319 > > > jmf > > Thank you jmf. I believe that for the first time you have moved beyond > a single point of complaint to a swathe of data points which evidently > show performance regression. You would need to provide data of what > these tests 1-35 are.
Uhhh.. Making the subject line useful for all readers -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
