On 23 fév, 20:08, Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote: > On 02/23/2013 10:44 AM, jmfauth wrote: > > [snip various stupidities] > > > jmf > > Peter, jmfauth is one of our resident trolls. Feel free to ignore him. > > -- > ~Ethan~
Sorry, what can say? More memory and slow down! If you see a progress, I'm seeing a regression. Did you test Devanagari canonical decomposition? Probably not. I did it. I wrote probably more tests than any core developper and tests doing precisely what this flexible representation does (not like the tests I saw). That's the good point of all this story. It is not every day that, one has two implementations of the same product, if one wishes to explain, to teach, to illustrate unicode or the coding of the characters in general. Unicode is not different from the other coding schemes and it behaves exactly in the same way. The solely and basic difference lies in the set of the *characters* which is broader. Unicode, the Consortium, uses the term, "Abstract Character Repertoire". jmf -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
