piterrr.dolin...@gmail.com wrote: <snip/> > So far I am getting the impression that Python is a toy language of some > kind (similar to Basic of the early 80's), not really suitable for serious > work. The only difference between these languages (admittedly, a serious > one) is the existence of extensive libraries. Otherwise there would be no > good reason for Python to exist. Nevertheless, it does exist and I have to > learn it. As long as someone is paying for my time, that's OK with me.
That's some military-grade trolling. Rui Maciel -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
