> To do what you're looking for there, I wouldn't bother with argparse > at all - I'd just look at sys.argv[1] for the word you're looking for. > Yes, it'd be a bit strict and simplistic, but by the look of things, > you don't need sophistication.
You are right, but I think sys.argv is very basic. Before argparse even I was using it, but it was very hard to manage if user has less argument, more argument or more argument. I think argparse is the better thing than sys.argv, and I believe there might be any way to tackle my (argparse) problem. That is what I am looking here for. -- Twitter <https://twitter.com/sntshk> | Github <https://github.com/santosh> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
