On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Rick Johnson
<rantingrickjohn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, February 8, 2013 6:05:54 PM UTC-6, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> The sum builtin works happily on any sequence of objects
>> that can be added together. It works as an excellent
>> flatten() method:
>>
>> >>> nested_list = [["q"], ["w","e"], ["r","t","u"], ["i","o","p"]]
>> >>> sum(nested_list,[])
>> ['q', 'w', 'e', 'r', 't', 'u', 'i', 'o', 'p']
>> >>> nested_list
>> [['q'], ['w', 'e'], ['r', 't', 'u'], ['i', 'o', 'p']]
>
> What the hell? Oh yeah, you must be using pike again. No, if it were pike the
> list would look like this:
>
> ({({"q"}), ({"w","e"}), ({"r","t","u"}), ({"i","o","p"})})
>
> Of course you'd have to declare it first using an /expanded/ Java syntax:
>
> nested_list = array(array(string))
>
> Folks, i couldn't make this stuff up if i wanted to. Go read for yourself if
> want a few laughs.
Classic ad hominem. Try to make your opponent look bad by making fun
of them on a completely unrelated topic, and then hope that nobody
notices that you entirely ignored the substance of their argument.
Sorry, it didn't work.
You didn't even do a good job of it. Yes, Pike uses two characters
instead of one to wrap array literals. Big friggin' whoop. On the
minus side, it's a little more typing. On the plus side, they stand
out better, and you don't have the [] characters doing double duty
denoting list literals and indexing alike. Yes, Pike writes **string
as the more readable array(array(string)) -- although if my memory
serves correctly the former is also legal syntax. Again, nobody
cares. And by the by, Pike is a descendant of C, not Java. Its
predecessor LPC predates Java by about 6 years. If you're going to
start lambasting others' preferred programming languages in an effort
to make yourself look good, you can at least get your facts straight.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
