On 6/25/05, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:41:58 +0200, Konstantin Veretennicov wrote: > > > On 6/25/05, Mandus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It is really a consensus on this; that > >> removing map, filter, reduce is a good thing? It will render a whole lot > >> of my software unusable :( > > > > I think you'll be able to use "from __past__ import map, filter, > > reduce" or something like that :) They don't have to be built-in. > > More likely they will be moved to something like itertools than "__past__". > > Or just define them yourself: > > def map(f, seq): > return [f(x) for x in seq] > > def filter(p, seq): > return [x for x in seq if p(x)] > > def reduce(f, seq, zero): > r = zero > for x in seq: r = f(r, x) > return r
FWIW, these don't exactly reproduce behaviour of current built-ins. Filter, for instance, doesn't always return lists and map accepts more than one seq... Just my $.02. - kv -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
