> If that's your intention, then instead of coming up with something totally
> new, unpythonic and ugly, why not take the normal Python route and
> implement a subset of the ElementTree API?
>
> Stefan
Because the tree implementation in ElementTree or other tree modules in Python
require a lot of typing and parenthesis
To produce the HTML code
<DIV>hello <B>world</B></DIV>
these modules require writing something like
div = Tag('DIV')
div.appendChild(TextNode('hello '))
b = Tag('B')
b.appendChild(TextNode('world'))
div.appendChild(b)
doc.appendChild(div)
With the tree syntax proposed in Brython it would just be
doc <= DIV('hello '+B('world'))
If "pythonic" means concise and readable, which one is more pythonic ?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
