On 23 Jun 2005 13:46:18 -0700, Peter Herndon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Reasonable enough. As per Mike's suggestion below, building a few web > pages to document the apps is a good start. To expand on that idea, > you could write daemons/cron jobs, perhaps in Python if Python runs on > OS/400,
http://www.iseriespython.com/ > that monitor each app's status and log that information to the > web server. I'm ot sure how you'd define an 'application' on a '400. You just have a bunch of progams in libraries. I'm not sure what the 'status' of an application might meain, either, in general terms. This is really very pooly specified. > You could then write a web application that takes the > monitoring data and formats it appropriately for human consumption. Running a Python web application on a '400 would be a pretty daunting task, if it's even possible. > Perhaps an RSS or Atom feed for each application's status. > > I don't know anything about OS/400, but if it has a tool similar to > syslog, you could configure the application hosts to report their > status to a remote syslogd, perhaps on your web server, and parse the > log file for the status data. QHST is similar to syslog - but what's an application host in 400 terms? -- Cheers, Simon B, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.brunningonline.net/simon/blog/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list