Hey everyone, this is my final mail. With all your help we have decided on names for our function. It was a surprisingly difficult process but your inputs helped tremendously. I have described our experiences (very good ones here, but somewhat mixed ones with StackOverflow) in a blog entry: http://www.getautoma.com/blog/New-version-of-Automa-with-improved-API
I will now stop spamming this list. Thank you so much again! If you're interested in how we're getting on in the future, do follow us on Twitter @BugFreeSoftware or on our blog http://www.getautoma.com/blog! Thanks again, Michael Co-founder and lead developer @BugFreeSoftware http://www.getautoma.com On Friday, November 23, 2012 5:12:39 PM UTC+1, Michael Herrmann wrote: > Hi, > > > > do you think it's bad style to override the built-in function `type`? I'm > co-developing a GUI automation library called Automa > (http://www.getautoma.com) and 'type' would be a very fitting name for a > function that generates artificial key strokes. > > > > This post is motivated by an already lengthy discussion on this mailing list > (http://bit.ly/10aOy4H), where we tried to find alternative names for `type`. > Many were found, but none are quite as fitting as 'type'. > > > > For the sake of avoiding a discussion that is already being lead elsewhere > please confine this thread to what you generally think about overriding > `type`, and post suggestions for alternative names or solutions in the other > thread. > > > > Thank you very much! > > Michael -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list