Oscar Benjamin wrote: > I don't know if this is to do with the way that the code was > simplified before posting but this subproc function wrapper does > nothing (even after Peter fixed it below). This code is needlessly > complicated for what it does.
Jean-Michel's Post had the following comment preceding his subproc() definition >>> # here it should be decorated, but for this example to be kept >>> simple, the function is only wrapped, doing nothing special which I unhelpfully removed... -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
