Le jeudi 18 octobre 2012 11:07:25 UTC+2, Hans Mulder a écrit :
> On 18/10/12 08:31:51, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 02:06:19 -0400, Zero Piraeus wrote:
>
> >> 3. Say "well, at least it's not a backslash" and break the line using
>
> >> > parentheses.
>
> > I mostly do this. Since most lines include a bracket of some sort, I
>
> > rarely need to add outer parentheses just for the purpose of line
>
> > continuation.
>
> >
>
> > some_variable = spam('x') + ham(
>
> > some_longer_variables, here_and_here,
>
> > and_here_also)
>
>
>
> I would spell that as:
>
>
>
> some_variable = spam('x') + ham(
>
> some_longer_variables,
>
> here_and_here,
>
> and_here_also,
>
> )
>
>
>
> > I know PEP 8 says I should drop the final round bracket to the next line,
>
> > but I don't normally like that.
>
>
>
> I normally put the final bracket on the next line, where it is
>
> very visible. Compare:
>
>
>
> if looks_like_it_might_be_spam(
>
> some_longer_variables,
>
> here_and_here, and_here_also):
>
> logger.notice("might be spam")
>
> move_to_spam_folder(some_longer_variables)
>
> update_spam_statistics(here_and_here)
>
>
>
> vs.
>
>
>
> if looks_like_it_might_be_spam(
>
> some_longer_variables,
>
> here_and_here,
>
> and_here_also,
>
> ):
>
> logger.notice("might be spam")
>
> move_to_spam_folder(some_longer_variables)
>
> update_spam_statistics(here_and_here)
>
>
>
> Which one would you say is more readable?
>
>
>
>
>
> -- HansM
I use a "double indentation".
>>> if 'asdf' and 'asdf' and 'asdf' \
... 'asdf' and 'asdf' and \
... 'asdf' and 'asdf':
... print('do if')
... s = 'asdf'
... ss = 'asdf'
...
do if
>>> if looks_like_it_might_be_spam(
... some_longer_variables,
... here_and_here, and_here_also):
... logger.notice("might be spam")
... move_to_spam_folder(some_longer_variables)
... update_spam_statistics(here_and_here)
...
Traceback (most recent call last):
jmf
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
