On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Dwight Hutto <dwightdhu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 1:02 AM, rusi <rustompm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Oct 7, 9:15 am, Ramchandra Apte <maniandra...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sunday, 7 October 2012 00:13:58 UTC+5:30, Darryl Owens wrote: >>> > I am currently starting my PhD in software quality assurance and have >>> > been doing a lot of reading round this subject. I am just trying to find >>> > out if there is any relevant/current research in the production of a >>> > generic quality assurance tool i.e. a tool/methodology that can accept >>> > many languages for the following areas: >>> >>> > • Problems in code/coding errors >>> >>> > • Compiler bugs >>> >>> > • Language bugs >>> >>> > • Users mathematical model >>>
You could also utilize other unittests from other languages, and roll that into wrappers that checked for specific languages utilization, and it's probable errors, by initiating the unittest functions with a python call specific to the language being utilized. -- Best Regards, David Hutto CEO: http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
