On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Demian Brecht <demianbre...@gmail.com> wrote: > (A little OT so my apologies up front) > > > On 12-09-28 12:39 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> >> I love the idea, even though I shan't be entering. Code golf is awesome >> fun! > > > Code golf is indeed awesome fun and I usually enjoy taking part as well. > However, I'm not a fan of code golf such as this, that uses a framework and > then defines a rule that you *can't* hack on the same framework. > > In the framework/external module spirit, I *could* write a module that does > *all* of this for me (in Pyramid, Django, web2py, etc) and then enter with a > simple method call in another module. > > Done. One liner. I win ;) > > I much prefer code golf that tests algorithmic/core language feature > knowledge. Of course, that's entirely only my opinion. > > -- > Demian Brecht > @demianbrecht > http://demianbrecht.github.com > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Well I suppose I could lax that same requirement. I.e.: if you can get these decorators (also working with RBAC) in, for example: Django; then it still satisfied the rules :) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
