Chris Angelico於 2012年9月22日星期六UTC+8下午10時10分12秒寫道： > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Steven D'Aprano > > <steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote: > > > As per their partnership agreement, IBM took over development of OS/2 > > > version 2 while Microsoft worked on developing version 3. OS/2 2.0 was > > > significantly improved over the 1.x series. > > > > > > Then Microsoft reneged on the agreement to release OS/2 version 3, and > > > instead re-badged it as Windows NT. One might say there was a little bit > > > of bad blood over this, especially as IBM had good reason to think that > > > Microsoft had been spending IBM's money on NT. > > > > And ever since then, Microsoft's been doing its best to kill OS/2 off. > > By the look of the database server sitting next to me, and the clients > > scattered throughout the building, it seems they have yet to > > succeed... > > > > OS/2 and Linux interoperate quite happily, too. Standards so . > > > > ChrisA
This is off topic in this forum. But we are getting so far at the MMU part. A cpu with an L1 and an L2 caches of large sizes is better to be equipped with a VMS like OS in the thread and the heap managements. But if the situation is different, some other alternative approaches might be more appropriate. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
