Ulrich Eckhardt於 2012年9月21日星期五UTC+8下午5時15分03秒寫道：
> Am 21.09.2012 00:58, schrieb thorso...@lavabit.com:
>
> > list = [{'1': []}, {'2': []}, {'3': ['4', '5']}]
>
> >
>
> > I want to check for a value (e.g. '4'), and get the key of the dictionary
>
> > that contains that value.
>
>
>
> Note:
>
> 1. list is a built-in type, who's name is rebound above
>
> 2. The list above contains dictionaries that all only contain a single key?
>
> 3. You have strings containing decimal representations of numbers?
>
>
>
> > (Yep, this is bizarre.)
>
>
>
> The data are really stored in a strange way and you might be able to
>
> make things clearer by reorganizing them a bit.
>
>
>
>
>
> > some_magic(list, '4')
>
> > => '3'
>
> >
>
> > What's the functional way to do it?
>
>
>
> Functional as in functional programming and an emphasis on lazy
>
> evaluation? In that case I'd write a generator that emits the keys where
>
> the values contain the requested string.
>
>
>
>
>
> > Is it possible to do it with a one-liner?
>
>
>
> Yep, filter(), lambda and the 'in' operator. Question remains if this is
>
> readable. Note that you can use a local function, too, if you just want
>
> to reduce the scope/visibility.
>
>
>
>
>
> Good luck!
>
>
>
>
>
> Uli
I don't think functional aspects are only marked as lazy
programming.
It just means when one is experimenting something
the efficient execution in speed is not on focus
yet.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
