On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.ke...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The lack of an ORDER BY is the least of the problems with that SQL. >> He's also using LIMIT without OFFSET, so the only thing that the >> 'item' argument changes is how many rows are returned (all but one of >> which are ignored), not which one is actually fetched. > > No, he's using the two-arg form of LIMIT.
My mistake. I didn't even know there was a two-arg form of LIMIT. Must be a MySQL thing. :-) Cheers, Ian -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
