Philippe C. Martin wrote: >Thank you all for your answers. > >A pure Python would have beenmy first choice. yet I now feel I should spend >some time looking at PySQLite (I like the fact it's pre-compiled for >Windows). > >Thanks. > >Philippe > > > >Philippe C. Martin wrote: > > > >>Hi, >> >>I am looking for a stand-alone (not client/server) database solution for >>Python. >> >>1) speed is not an issue >>2) I wish to store less than 5000 records >>3) each record should not be larger than 16K >> >> >>As I start with Python objects, I thought of using shelve, but looking at >>the restrictions (record size + potential collisions) I feel I should >>study my options a bit further before I get started. >> >> >>Regards, >> >>Philippe >> >> > > > Out of the suggestions SnakeSQL and KirbyBase are pure python. Gadfly is sorta pure, in that it will work without the compiled kjbuckets lib.
J -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
