On 02/09/2012 08:36, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Le jeudi 30 août 2012 17:01:50 UTC+2, Antoine Pitrou a écrit :
I honestly suggest you shut up until you have a clue.
Désolé Antoine,
I have not the knowledge to dive in the Python code,
but I know what is a character.
You're a character, and from my observations on this thread you're very
humorous. YMMV.
The coding of the characters is a domain per se,
independent from the os, from the computer languages.
Before spending time to implement a new algorithm,
maybe it is better to ask, if there is something
better than the actual schemes.
Please write a new PEP indicating how you would correct your perceived
deficiencies with PEP 393 and its implementation.
I still remember my thoughts when I read the PEP 393
discussion: "this is not logical", "they do no understand
typography", "atomic character ???", ...
When PEP 393 was first drafted how much input did you give during the
acceptance process, if any?
Real world exemples.
import libfrancais
li = ['noël', 'noir', 'nœud', 'noduleux', \
Why the unneeded continuation character, fancy wasting storage space?
... 'noétique', 'noèse', 'noirâtre']
r = libfrancais.sortfr(li)
r
['noduleux', 'noël', 'noèse', 'noétique', 'nœud', 'noir',
'noirâtre']
What has sorting foreign words got to do with the internal representaion
of the individual characters?
(cf "Le Petit Robert")
or
The *letters* satisfying the requirements of the
"Imprimerie nationale".
jmf
I've just rechecked my calendar and it's definitly not 1st April today.
Poor old me I'm baffled as always.
--
Cheers.
Mark Lawrence.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
